A successful resolution?
I guess I have a somewaht different perspective to the official line - "Thank you Kendal - grovel, grovel, - thank you, thank you, Graham Vincent for rescuing us"
It was a great insight to spend four market days talking to the people at the Market Square resulting in more than 400 signing a petition, 200 pledging money - with a few actually saying "as much as it takes" and with 18 volunteers committing themselves (James Airey to his credit added his name later).
The TIC really mattered to them.
I believe it matters to most of us.
We have lots of other issues that really matter to us. In order of stength of feeling I would place:
1. Control over the car parking policy, especially over land that Ulverston people own or have been bequeathed - The Gill and Stockbridge Lane respectively.
2. The running of our toilets
3. The running of our markets
4. The running of our Town Hall - which we do not own
5. The running of our Coronation Hall - which we do not own.
6. The maintenance of our streets.
7. The enforcement of Dog Fouling legislation
8. The enforcement of Car Parking legislation
True the order above may be at fault. - Speak up with your pet concern
The crunch line in all these is that -
We have no control over the above and we resent theis - Kendal in the form of local government does.
There are many towns where they do not have the same situation:
Grange has control over its TIC, its Town Hall and equivalent of the Coro.
Settle has control over its Market - something it fought hard for.
Now, as Grange are at present battling over - with this control comes responsibility.
Control requires management, enforcement, policy and maintenance. It's hard work.
It also requires financial commitment - Grange raises money through local rates to run their responsibilities - which can be seen as unfair - they pay twice - to the SLDC for other town's TIC and in addition for their own TIC.x
However what it has is pride.
If you visit the Grange Council Management there is a completely different atmosphere to that at Ulverston - there is no us and them - being kept at a distance, I find here - keep your nose out - we know what is best for you - that you've read about here, at the Town Hall.
At Grange there's a real buzz of involvement. Their secretaries have time for you, the, in addition to the work commitments, organise fund raising activities like the recent Bay Walk. Their councillor, Tom Harvey, speaks up forcibly for Grange instead of the wimp behavior from our councillors - Janet Wilkinson, Colin Hodgson and James Airey - that I witnessed at the recent Cabinet Meeting that made me furious and led to the 'Wimps with no Balls' comment over their handling of the Stockbrige Carpark issue - which I still stand by - made by me recently here.
My point is:
We need to claw back control of the things that we consider important to the town.
This requires hardship - both financial and commitment of time - but from my contact on the Market Square - this what many (most?) Ulverstonians want.
Ulverstonians want their sense of pride back.
They want things like their Town Bank Clock fixed quickly when it appears a simple matter of a severed cable.
Councillors for the most part are out of touch with this sense of determination.
I get the dismaying response from Jenkinson and Bishop-Rowe and others that "Kendal would never allow that" and "I've tried and it can't be done". What a defeatist attitude.
Then to top it all there's this "leave it to us- we know best - if we can't do it - you certainly can't" which I've proved wrong several times.
So TIC : missed opportunity in my view - we were heavily let down by the grand talking Paul Jarvis of Ulverston Community Partnership when in my view he had a viable commitment for Ulverston to take over the TIC and he avoided it. Neither did James Airey persuade him to change his attitude.
With an attitude like this, in the long term, we are sunk.
We will end up, as a thriving business man in the town predicts - a ghost town - a pale reflection of the leading Town in our area a century ago when the iron industry thrived under the Kennedys only a century ago.
With control over our TIC a sense of the community fighting together to make this the best TIC in Cumbria, could have resulted and with it could have come control over a tourist web site that is so essential.
What may happen next is that the TIC is vastly trimmed down in manpower to fit the needs of the Coro Hall itself (under the mismanagement of a notoriously badly managed district council - in the bottom 15% in the country - who find it costs some £300 per week to maintain a toilet) so that it no longer operates effectively.
The next step in my thinking that would be a big one but thoroughly within the town's capability is the take over of the whole Coronation Hall operation.
We've enough enthusiasm for the activities here from a very wide area to help this do well in spite of cutbacks.
It would then be our Coro run for the benefit of our societies and performers and the people who risk putting on shows. We have the potential of a really successful operation here.
Why leave it in the hands of Kendal and the SLDC to be messed around with.
Fighters - please step forward.
Are you one?
Encouraginng each other to be assertive is something that is very important to me! Relying on others can be very frustrating. People using their own initiative can often achieve far more. Self belief is important! We llive in a town where this already happens so much . It will be natural for us as to do this more and more..
Showing posts with label coro. Show all posts
Showing posts with label coro. Show all posts
Sunday, 21 November 2010
Thursday, 24 June 2010
Important flood review meeting this next Monday
This is a very important meeting for all the people of Ulverston especially those from South Ulverston:
This Monday 28th June 2010 at 7:00 in the Coronation Mail Hall
It follows what I found to be a shambolic meeting last December chaired bythe then Mayor Norman Bishop-Rowe when a lot of questions were asked and very few answered. One at which I found out far more by talking to the Environment Agency Representative after the meeting than during.
This time, the meeting called, by the new Mayor Phil Lister, to review the findings and progress it is very important. We must be told, as exactly as possible, why the flooding occurred in and around the houses. The issues are not simple.
The residents I believe have some mistaken beliefs of the causes of their problems. As a result ever since the December Meeting they have clamoured for the wrong things to be done to remedy the situation. The town drains and the level of tarmac are not, I believe, the main problem, the control of the river is.
If we get a clear description of the sequence of events from the experts then people can make judgements as to what the priorities should be.
The only people's opinion I would trust is that of the Environment Agency as they are the only people who want to truth to come out. They benefit from a campaign based on their facts, as they can then hope that public pressure, put on the government will result for more funds for the Agency to improve the solution to the problem.
All the other agencies are more likely to try to make out that it wasn't their fault.
The Town in my opinion have a responsibility to make sure that when something similar - or worse happens next, there are clear sets of actions that will immediately happen.
The residents and Ulverstonians in general need to have confidence in the system so that it reaches as fair and quick a result as possible.
I believe if little is done, we will have an even worse disaster within the next five years.
I also believe that whatever is done, in the long term South Ulverston will certainly get flooded so in the long term we must plan for this.
This Monday 28th June 2010 at 7:00 in the Coronation Mail Hall
It follows what I found to be a shambolic meeting last December chaired bythe then Mayor Norman Bishop-Rowe when a lot of questions were asked and very few answered. One at which I found out far more by talking to the Environment Agency Representative after the meeting than during.
This time, the meeting called, by the new Mayor Phil Lister, to review the findings and progress it is very important. We must be told, as exactly as possible, why the flooding occurred in and around the houses. The issues are not simple.
The residents I believe have some mistaken beliefs of the causes of their problems. As a result ever since the December Meeting they have clamoured for the wrong things to be done to remedy the situation. The town drains and the level of tarmac are not, I believe, the main problem, the control of the river is.
If we get a clear description of the sequence of events from the experts then people can make judgements as to what the priorities should be.
The only people's opinion I would trust is that of the Environment Agency as they are the only people who want to truth to come out. They benefit from a campaign based on their facts, as they can then hope that public pressure, put on the government will result for more funds for the Agency to improve the solution to the problem.
All the other agencies are more likely to try to make out that it wasn't their fault.
The Town in my opinion have a responsibility to make sure that when something similar - or worse happens next, there are clear sets of actions that will immediately happen.
The residents and Ulverstonians in general need to have confidence in the system so that it reaches as fair and quick a result as possible.
I believe if little is done, we will have an even worse disaster within the next five years.
I also believe that whatever is done, in the long term South Ulverston will certainly get flooded so in the long term we must plan for this.
Monday, 4 January 2010
Manchester Camerata Concert on Saturday last
These concerts in the Coro never cease to inspire me.
The standard of the latest was sky high and the whole orchestra played very well.
A lot was due to the conductor who instilled a lot of enthusiasm in the musicians and thence to the whole hall.
There was a great sense of fun throughout. Well known works where brought to life so that you noticed for the first time harmonies and ways of playing that had been missed before.
The atmosphere for me surpassed the Last Night of the Proms which the program emulated.
Good to be part of a packed house.
Inspired me to achieve the same standard of excellence in my present projects, especially the Flowers/Parks one.
Feeling very grateful that these people travel all the way from Manchester to entertain us.
Aren't we lucky to have this standard of entertainment here in Ulverston!
The standard of the latest was sky high and the whole orchestra played very well.
A lot was due to the conductor who instilled a lot of enthusiasm in the musicians and thence to the whole hall.
There was a great sense of fun throughout. Well known works where brought to life so that you noticed for the first time harmonies and ways of playing that had been missed before.
The atmosphere for me surpassed the Last Night of the Proms which the program emulated.
Good to be part of a packed house.
Inspired me to achieve the same standard of excellence in my present projects, especially the Flowers/Parks one.
Feeling very grateful that these people travel all the way from Manchester to entertain us.
Aren't we lucky to have this standard of entertainment here in Ulverston!
Friday, 25 September 2009
Concert in the Coro last night
WOW
The performance of De Falla was electrifying - with an amazing Spanish conductor too.
Absolutely memorable.
With visions of Firey Spanish Gypsy Women who will tear your eyes out if provoked!
By contrast the sad cold lonely lifeless . . . empty seats. . . .
.
The performance of De Falla was electrifying - with an amazing Spanish conductor too.
Absolutely memorable.
With visions of Firey Spanish Gypsy Women who will tear your eyes out if provoked!
By contrast the sad cold lonely lifeless . . . empty seats. . . .
.
Tuesday, 2 June 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
