Why don't they get on with it ?
And keep their greedy hands off our woods and forests
See this site for what's happening:
Save the Lake District's Forests
So will you vote for Tim Farron if he doesn't oppose this proposal.
I won't - beware Tim - dissolve the Coalition if this kind of thing is going on.
This proposal is sheer madness:
1. It is to sell assets that we should be bringing in a steady income. Once sold - no income. This is very much a short term solution.
2. In private hands the aim will, and has to, be to generating money. Thus needs that not not do this are bound to be marginalised wherever possible - it will be a continuous battle to prevent the loss of facilities. Furthermore our forests generate income indirectly for the wider tourist industry; unless the private ownership benefits from tourism it has no incentive to make our open spaces accessible. The private ownership would therefore have to make money out of the forest itself (say wood) and tourism say hotels outdoor pursuits etc to have this incentive.
Surely the best course of action is to run the forests more effectively by, for instance, improving attractive access and promoting tourism.
1. It is to sell assets that we should be bringing in a steady income. Once sold - no income. This is very much a short term solution.
2. In private hands the aim will, and has to, be to generating money. Thus needs that not not do this are bound to be marginalised wherever possible - it will be a continuous battle to prevent the loss of facilities. Furthermore our forests generate income indirectly for the wider tourist industry; unless the private ownership benefits from tourism it has no incentive to make our open spaces accessible. The private ownership would therefore have to make money out of the forest itself (say wood) and tourism say hotels outdoor pursuits etc to have this incentive.
Surely the best course of action is to run the forests more effectively by, for instance, improving attractive access and promoting tourism.


