Submissions to SLDC Planning are still being accepted I suspect.
There has always been a strong spirit in Ulverston and the
surrounding area. It is a people centred town and continues to battle for the
people and businesses of the town who, given the chance are self sufficient. It
is this buoyant attitude that politicians need to recognise ( and even be wary
of). The town attracts people who support it strongly with entrepreneurial
flair that will show itself more and more as Ulverston struggles for survival (
The Ulverston Brewery, the Marl International, the LED business that is now a world leader. Glaxo
laboratories that are returning once again.) An increasing number of large
companies are attempting to take advantage of imagined opportunities. These
they can quickly find are not so attractive as they first thought because of
lack of local support so that they pull out leaving gaps in the provision of
services. Examples are the Armstrongs Insurance a thriving local business
bought up be Swensens only to close shortly afterwards leaving Ulverston
without this service. Tesco at the moment are not being supported as well as
they had hoped and could close up any day because of the strong competition
coming from the community based Coop.
Sainsbury’s supermarket is of very limited value to the town
of Ulverston and can cause enormous harm as a result of it’s attempt to gain a
foothold. We already have a thriving supermarket with a strong local bias which
combines with low cost shops in town to provide and enviable service to the
town.
Most of Sainsbury’s appeal comes from sophisticated
campaigning which appeals to myths held by some of the public. Ulverston is one
of the remaining towns in the country were people value each other highly. With
the economic situation even this is being challenged; yet this is precisely
when people need to value each other because this is the most important thing
in a community: people.
It is a myth that another supermarket is needed in the town
for the following reasons:
1. It is not cheaper. Time and time again when the facts are
really examined rather than the myths accepted, people find that goods
purchased from small well run businesses are cheaper. Furthermore the service
comes with a genuine smile based on honest hard work for the community. Local
businessmen know how to resource quality products using a network of local
suppliers. Butchers can access local farmers with the situation that they even
know the animals that have been slaughtered specifically to provide meat on their counter. Beef that has
been fattened with food that ensures quality taste. Where a cheap cut is needed
than they again can supply this way below supermarket price. Only this week my
family were offered and bought a
pork hock at £1:20 for a kilogramme this gave 500 gm of local meat at a price
way below supermarket prices. Vegetables are another case in point where not
only prices can be 30% of supermarket prices on the market stalls but local
shops provide a far wider range of everyday veg at lower prices than the
supermarket.
2. Supermarkets are not need in that most people work either
in Barrow or Kendal and shop there. For those that don’t Barrow supermarkets
can be accessed by car at £3.50 petrol and with a return journey of less than
40 minutes - a monthly trip being all that is needed. Several local Coops serve
the community well with the bulk of products needed that aren’t covered by the
local shops.
3. The proposed location is not only dangerous to potential
foot traffic but also to car travel being situated where insufficient
visibility is available . Through traffic will also cause significant delay on
a busy main road, the A590 between the motorway and Ulverston and Barrow.
4. What the new supermarket can offer is free parking at a
time when thanks to cooperation with SLDC the car park charges are being
reviewed with the criteria that they are set to ensure maximum usage in the
town and hence high income rather than a regime over the past twenty years
where charges have been in line with the tourist car parks in the Lakes where
there is a captured market. Here in Ulverston other towns have benefited from
traffic and a thriving market is now struggling in contrast with other northern
towns where the town has been able to set the charges to suit the town and
ensure that this important resource is used to 85% capacity (Stockbridge Lane
by contrast has operated for years at less than 5% and thus bring in only
£10,000 per year to benefit SLDC on a car park that was willed to the town for
its own benefit..
The high car parking charges have been a nightmare for the
trade in the town . Now there is the potential a new era when once again trade
will return to the town.
5. The false argument of Sainsbury is glaringly apparent
when they state that they will create new jobs. First the numbers are inflated
by counting part time jobs but far more important is the fact that for every
new job provided it is likely that two will be lost – one to the shops in town
but easily forgotten those in the locality that are the suppliers who operate
on small profit margins made worse by lower demand these businesses depend on
the maximum trade provided by dependable local shops and markets.
6. The last cruel injustice brought to a caring town is that
large companies inevitably use many lawyers to take advantage of tax loopholes
which in practice the government aren’t able to plug. The small local
businessman has no access to these resources of expertise and trades at a
disadvantage. MPs have recently demonstrated their frustration with Starbucks,
Google, Tesco who pay little to no tax.
Why Sainsbury’s ?
Prominent tax campaigner Richard Murphy, from Tax Research UK states
that very few companies are completely "clean": the Co-op bank has an
offshore banking arm, the BBC's use of freelance contracts has been attacked.
The Guardian Media Group itself has been criticised for holding some of its
assets through companies in the Cayman Islands and Luxembourg. It is human
nature to take advantages where they are available.
“Starbucks is a nice easy target at the end of the road, and
Murphy says the fact the Daily Mail is calling for a boycott shows which way
the tide is running. But the problem of tax avoidance is deep-rooted and
ultimately only politicians can change the landscape. Their Faustian pact with multinationals has to end.
This is about much more than where we buy our morning latte.”
We call upon this planning committee of politicians to support the
underdog. The repercussions amongst local people at the sense of injustice will
be enormous if they don’t . They have a very strong sense of justice.
The Future
It is important to consider the likely possibilities if a supermarket
was accepted. The management of a large proportion of the trade with then pass
to remote executives that will have no allegiance to out town. With transport
costs rising steadily and the principal of operation of a supermarket being
based on the use of wide road networks then supermarkets situated away from the
national networks will be the first to be discarded when it is recognised that
economy of travel is paramount. Thus the Furness , stuck out on a limb will be
very vulnerable.
By contrast local traders with their detailed local
knowledge build close links with local suppliers and keep transport costs down.
This enables the low costs of food that local shops enjoy.
The successful future surely in difficult times is for trade
to remain in the hands of small family businesses who have a strong feeling of loyalty not only to
their customers but also to the farm suppliers they use. Unlike Nationally
based companies like Tesco and Sainsbury’s food is not shipped from even Europe
whilst fuel prices permit this. Surely this model of supply cannot continue at
a time when the worlds resources of fuel are having to be shared amongst counties like China with their the
rapidly expanding fuel hungry middle classes .
No, keeping trade in the hands of canny local businessmen is
essential for a town which can take care of itself and could easily be
abandoned by remote executives in London or even in Europe – in Germany and
Bonn in the future. Here low cost and well managed car parks will be essential
not only to local traders but also to SLDC as a sources of income (one lost to
the SLDC if a supermarket is in charge).